- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case T-88/08: Action brought on 18 February 2008 — Republic of Cyprus v Commission
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62008TN0088
62008TN0088
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
7.6.2008
EN
Official Journal of the European Union
C 142/27
(Case T-88/08)
(2008/C 142/49)
Language of the case: Greek
Parties
Applicant: Republic of Cyprus (represented by: P. Kliridis)
Defendant: Commission of the European Communities
Form of order sought
The applicant claims that the notice is unlawful for the following reasons:
—first, because, in issuing the notice, the Commission exceeded and/or infringed its legal basis, to be specific Council Regulation (EC) No 389/2006 of 27 February 2006 establishing an instrument of financial support for encouraging the economic development of the Turkish Cypriot community and amending Council Regulation (EC) No 2667/2000 on the European Agency for Reconstruction (1);
—second, because the notice is contrary to and/or incompatible with Article 299 EC, as amended by Article 19 of the Act concerning the conditions of accession of the Czech Republic, the Republic of Estonia, the Republic of Cyprus, the Republic of Latvia, the Republic of Lithuania, the Republic of Hungary, the Republic of Malta, the Republic of Poland, the Republic of Slovenia and the Slovak Republic (2) (‘the 2003 Act of Accession’) and Protocol No 10, on Cyprus, to the 2003 Act of Accession (3);
—third, because the notice is contrary to or incompatible with both obligations flowing from rules of mandatory international law and United Nations Security Council Resolutions 541(1983) and 550(1984); and
—fourth, because the notice was not published in the Official Journal.
* * *
(1) OJ 2006 L 65, p. 5.
(2) OJ 2003 L 236, p. 33.
(3) OJ 2003 L 236, p. 955.