- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case T-716/16: Order of the General Court of 19 July 2017 — Pfizer and Pfizer Santé familiale v Commission (Action for annulment — Customs union — Common Customs Tariff — Tariff and statistical nomenclature — Classification in the Combined Nomenclature — Tariff subheadings — Customs duties applicable to goods classified under those tariff subheadings — Regulatory act entailing implementing measures — Lack of individual concern — Inadmissibility)
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62016TB0716
62016TB0716
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
4.9.2017
Official Journal of the European Union
C 293/33
(Case T-716/16) (<span class="super note-tag">1</span>)
((Action for annulment - Customs union - Common Customs Tariff - Tariff and statistical nomenclature - Classification in the Combined Nomenclature - Tariff subheadings - Customs duties applicable to goods classified under those tariff subheadings - Regulatory act entailing implementing measures - Lack of individual concern - Inadmissibility))
(2017/C 293/39)
Language of the case: English
Parties
Applicants: Pfizer Ltd (Sandwich, United Kingdom) and Pfizer Santé familiale (Paris, France) (represented by: L. Catrain González, lawyer, and E. Wright, Barrister)
Defendant: European Commission (represented by: A. Caeiros and K. Skelly, acting as Agents)
Re:
Action pursuant to Article 263 TFEU seeking partial annulment of Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 2016/1140 of 8 July 2016 concerning the classification of certain goods in the Combined Nomenclature (OJ 2016 L 189, p. 1).
Operative part of the order
1.The action is dismissed as inadmissible.
2.Pfizer Ltd and Pfizer Santé familiale shall pay the costs.
(<span class="note">1</span>) OJ C 462, 12.12.2016.
* * *
Language of the case: English