EUR-Lex & EU Commission AI-Powered Semantic Search Engine
Modern Legal
  • Query in any language with multilingual search
  • Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
  • See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Start free trial

Similar Documents

Explore similar documents to your case.

We Found Similar Cases for You

Sign up for free to view them and see the most relevant paragraphs highlighted.

Case F-128/11: Order of the Civil Service Tribunal (Single Judge) of 18 December 2015 — De Nicola v EIB (Civil Service — EIB staff — Appraisal — 2010 staff report — Contested — Internal procedures — Conditions — Withdrawal — Action — Lack of locus standi — Reasonable time — Failure to comply — Manifestly inadmissible)

ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62011FB0128

62011FB0128

December 18, 2015
With Google you find a lot.
With us you find everything. Try it now!

I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!

Valentina R., lawyer

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 48/98

(Case F-128/11)(1)

((Civil Service - EIB staff - Appraisal - 2010 staff report - Contested - Internal procedures - Conditions - Withdrawal - Action - Lack of locus standi - Reasonable time - Failure to comply - Manifestly inadmissible))

(2016/C 048/112)

Language of the case: Italian

Parties

Applicant: Carlo De Nicola (Strassen, Luxembourg) (represented by: L. Isola, laywer)

Defendant: European Investment Bank (represented by: G. Nuvoli and T. Gilliams, acting as Agents, and A. Dal Ferro, lawyer)

Re:

Application seeking, firstly, annulment of the e-mail messages and decisions of the EIB concerning the administrative procedure relating to the applicant’s performance appraisal for 2010, secondly, annulment of the decision whereby the President of the EIB refused to instigate the settlement procedure before the Conciliation Board, thirdly, annulment of the applicant’s annual appraisal for 2010 in so far as it does not award him ‘exceptional performance’ or ‘very good performance’ and does not propose his promotion to Function D and, finally, an order that the EIB pay compensation for the material and non-material damage sustained.

Operative part of the order

1.The action is dismissed as manifestly inadmissible.

2.Mr De Nicola shall bear his own costs and pay the costs incurred by the European Investment Bank.

(1)

OJ C 65, 3.3.2012, p. 21.

EurLex Case Law

AI-Powered Case Law Search

Query in any language with multilingual search
Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly

Get Instant Answers to Your Legal Questions

Cancel your subscription anytime, no questions asked.Start 14-Day Free Trial

At Modern Legal, we’re building the world’s best search engine for legal professionals. Access EU and global case law with AI-powered precision, saving you time and delivering relevant insights instantly.

Contact Us

Tivolska cesta 48, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia