- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Joined Cases C-532/15 and C-538/15: Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 8 December 2016 (requests for a preliminary ruling from the Audiencia Provincial de Zaragoza, Juzgado de Primera Instancia de Olot — Spain) — Eurosaneamientos SL, Entidad Urbanística Conservación Parque Tecnológico de Reciclado López Soriano, UTE PTR Acciona Infraestructuras SA v ArcelorMittal Zaragoza, SA (C-532/15), Francesc de Bolós Pi v Urbaser SA (C-538/15) (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Services provided by Procuradores de los Tribunales — Tariff — Jurisdictions — Derogation impossible)
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62015CA0532
62015CA0532
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
Official Journal of the European Union
C 38/4
(Joined Cases C-532/15 and C-538/15)
((Reference for a preliminary ruling - Services provided by Procuradores de los Tribunales - Tariff - Jurisdictions - Derogation impossible))
(2017/C 038/05)
Language of the case: Spanish
Referring courts
Parties to the main proceedings
Applicants: Eurosaneamientos SL, Entidad Urbanística Conservación Parque Tecnológico de Reciclado López Soriano, UTE PTR Acciona Infraestructuras SA (C-532/15), Francesc de Bolós Pi (C-538/15)
Defendants: ArcelorMittal Zaragoza, SA (C-532/15), Urbaser SA (C-538/15)
Intervener: Consejo General de Procuradores de España (C-532/15)
Operative part of the judgment
1.Article 101 TFEU, read in conjunction with Article 4(3) TEU, must be interpreted as not precluding national legislation, such as that at issue in the main proceedings, which makes the fees of procuradores subject to a tariff which may be increased or decreased only by 12 %, in respect of which the national courts merely check its strict application without being in a position, in exceptional circumstances, to derogate from the limits set by that tariff.
2.The Court of Justice of the European Union does not have jurisdiction to answer the second and third questions in Case C-532/15 and the third to fifth questions in Case C-538/15 referred by the Audiencia Provincial de Zaragoza (Provincial Court, Zaragoza, Spain) and the Juzgado de Primera Instancia de Olot (Court of First Instance, Olot, Spain) respectively.
*
Language of the case: Spanish.
ECLI:EU:C:2017:140