- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case T-586/13: Judgment of the General Court of 16 June 2015 — H. P. Gauff Ingenieure v OHIM (Gauff THE ENGINEERS WITH THE BROADER VIEW) (Community trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for Community figurative mark Gauff THE ENGINEERS WITH THE BROADER VIEW — Earlier national and Community word and figurative marks GAUFF — Relative grounds for refusal — Partial refusal to register — Application for restitutio in integrum — Article 81 of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009)
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62013TA0586
62013TA0586
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
10.8.2015
Official Journal of the European Union
C 262/21
(Case T-586/13)(1)
((Community trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Application for Community figurative mark Gauff THE ENGINEERS WITH THE BROADER VIEW - Earlier national and Community word and figurative marks GAUFF - Relative grounds for refusal - Partial refusal to register - Application for restitutio in integrum - Article 81 of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009))
(2015/C 262/27)
Language of the case: German
Parties
Applicant: H. P. Gauff Ingenieure GmbH & Co. KG — JBG (Nuremberg, Germany) (represented by: G. Schneider-Rothhaar, lawyer)
Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: A. Schifko, acting as Agent)
Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM, intervening before the General Court: Gauff GmbH & Co. Engineering KG (Nuremberg, Germany) (represented by: A. Molnar, lawyer)
Re:
Action brought against the decision of the First Board of Appeal of OHIM of 5 September 2013 (Case R 118/2013-1) relating to an application for restitutio in integrum.
Operative part of the judgment
The Court:
1.Dismisses the action;
2.Orders H.P. Gauff Ingenieure GmbH & Co. KG — JBG to bear its own costs as well as those incurred by the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM);
3.Orders Gauff GmbH & Co. Engineering KG to bear its own costs.
(1)
OJ C 24, 25.1.2014.