EUR-Lex & EU Commission AI-Powered Semantic Search Engine
Modern Legal
  • Query in any language with multilingual search
  • Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
  • See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Start free trial

Similar Documents

Explore similar documents to your case.

We Found Similar Cases for You

Sign up for free to view them and see the most relevant paragraphs highlighted.

Case T-485/10: Action brought on 13 October 2010 — MIP Metro v OHIM — J.C. Ribeiro SGPS (MISS B)

ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62010TN0485

62010TN0485

October 13, 2010
With Google you find a lot.
With us you find everything. Try it now!

I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!

Valentina R., lawyer

18.12.2010

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 346/51

(Case T-485/10)

()

2010/C 346/100

Language in which the application was lodged: German

Parties

Applicant: MIP METRO Group Intellectual Property GmbH & Co. KG (Düsseldorf, Germany) (represented by: J.-C Plate and R. Kaase, lawyers)

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM: J.C. Ribeiro SGPS S.A. (Sta Maria de Feira, Portugal)

Form of order sought

Declare the action admissible, together with the annexes thereto, against the decision of the First Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) of 5 August 2010 in Case R 1526/2009-1;

annul the contested decision in so far as it concerns the opposition to the trade mark application for goods in Classes 14 and 25, since it is incompatible with Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94;

order the defendant to pay the costs of the proceedings, including the costs of the appeal proceedings.

Pleas in law and main arguments

Applicant for a Community trade mark: J.C. Ribeiro SGPS S.A.

Community trade mark concerned: word mark 'MISS B' for goods in Classes 14, 16, 18, 21, 25 and 28.

Proprietor of the mark or sign cited in the opposition proceedings: the applicant.

Mark or sign cited in opposition: German and international word mark ‘miss H.’ for goods in Classes 6, 9, 14, 16, 18, 25 and 26, and the German figurative mark containing the word element ‘Miss H.’ for goods in Classes 3, 8, 9, 14, 16, 18, 20, 24, 25 and 26.

Decision of the Opposition Division: opposition upheld.

Decision of the Board of Appeal: appeal granted.

Pleas in law: infringement of Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009, since there is a likelihood of confusion between the two opposing marks.

Council Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 of 26 February 2009 on the Community trade mark (OJ 2009 L 78, p. 1).

EurLex Case Law

AI-Powered Case Law Search

Query in any language with multilingual search
Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly

Get Instant Answers to Your Legal Questions

Cancel your subscription anytime, no questions asked.Start 14-Day Free Trial

At Modern Legal, we’re building the world’s best search engine for legal professionals. Access EU and global case law with AI-powered precision, saving you time and delivering relevant insights instantly.

Contact Us

Tivolska cesta 48, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia