I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
EN
2012/C 373/19
Language of the case: Spanish
Applicant: Moreda-Riviere Trefilerías, SA (Gijón, Spain) (represented by: F. González Díaz and P. Herrero Prieto, lawyers)
Defendant: European Commission
The applicant claims that the General Court should:
—annul, pursuant to Article 264 TFEU, the decision of the European Commission of 25 July 2012 in Case COMP/38.344 — prestressing steel;
—require the Commission to provide, in accordance with Article 24 of the Statute of the Court of Justice of the European Union and Article 64(3)(d) of the Rules of Procedure of the General Court, the documents, calculations and other matters of law and/or fact that served as the basis to grant the requests for inability to pay of Proderac, CB, ITAS, OriMartin and Siderúrgica Latina Martin and/or to accept the reduction in the fine of AreclorMittal;
—in any event, order the European Commission to pay the costs.
The pleas in law and the main arguments are the same as those raised in Case T-438/12 Global Steel Wire v Commission.