- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case T-512/16: Order of the General Court of 24 November 2016 — ED v EUIPO (Civil service — Temporary staff — Teleworking — Request for extension — Refusal — Actions — Subsequent grant of invalidity — No need to adjudicate)
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62016TB0512
62016TB0512
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
23.1.2017
Official Journal of the European Union
C 22/36
(Case T-512/16) (<span class="super note-tag">1</span>)
((Civil service - Temporary staff - Teleworking - Request for extension - Refusal - Actions - Subsequent grant of invalidity - No need to adjudicate))
(2017/C 022/50)
Language of the case: English
Parties
Applicant: ED (Barcelona, Spain) (represented by: S. Pappas, lawyer)
Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: A. Lukošiūtė, P. Saba and D. Botis, acting as Agents)
Re:
Action brought under Article 270 TFEU, seeking annulment of the decision of EUIPO of 15 January 2014 refusing to grant the applicant’s request of 26 September 2013 to be allowed essentially to continue teleworking from Barcelona (Spain) until her health was restored.
Operative part of the order
1.There is no need to adjudicate in the present case.
2.ED shall bear one third of her own costs
3.The European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) shall bear its own costs and pay two thirds of the costs incurred by ED.
(<span class="note">1</span>) OJ C 184, 16.6.2014 (case initially registered before the Civil Service Tribunal of the European Union under number F-35/14 and transferred to the General Court of the European Union on 1.9.2016).