EUR-Lex & EU Commission AI-Powered Semantic Search Engine
Modern Legal
  • Query in any language with multilingual search
  • Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
  • See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Start free trial

Similar Documents

Explore similar documents to your case.

We Found Similar Cases for You

Sign up for free to view them and see the most relevant paragraphs highlighted.

Case C-814/19: Reference for a preliminary ruling from the High Court of Justice (England & Wales), Queen's Bench Division (Divisional Court) (United Kingdom) made on 6 November 2019 – AC, TM, GM, MM v ABC Sl, XYZ Plc

ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62019CN0814

62019CN0814

November 6, 2019
With Google you find a lot.
With us you find everything. Try it now!

I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!

Valentina R., lawyer

13.1.2020

Official Journal of the European Union

C 10/25

(Case C-814/19)

(2020/C 10/34)

Language of the case: English

Referring court

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicants: AC, TM, GM, MM

Defendants: ABC Sl, XYZ Plc

Questions referred

a.Is it a requirement of Article 13(3) of the recast Judgments Regulation 1215/2012 (1) that the cause of action on which the injured person relies in asserting a claim against the policy holder/insured involves a matter relating to insurance?

b.If the answer to (a) is yes, is the fact that the claim which the injured person seeks to bring against the policy holder/insured arises out of the same facts as, and is being brought in the same action as the direct claim brought against the insurer sufficient to justify a conclusion that the injured person's claim is a matter relating to insurance?

c.If the answer to (a) is no, is it sufficient that the joining of the insured to the direct action against the insurer is allowed by the law governing the direct action against the insurer?

d.Does the term ‘injured party’ under Article 13(2) cover a person born as a result of assisted reproduction techniques in circumstances where that person seeks to bring a claim asserting negligence in the performance of the assisted reproduction techniques used in that person's conception?

(1) Regulation (EU) No 1215/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 12 December 2012 on jurisdiction and the recognition and enforcement of judgments in civil and commercial matters (OJ 2012, L 351, p. 1).

* * *

Language of the case: English.

EurLex Case Law

AI-Powered Case Law Search

Query in any language with multilingual search
Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly

Get Instant Answers to Your Legal Questions

Cancel your subscription anytime, no questions asked.Start 14-Day Free Trial

At Modern Legal, we’re building the world’s best search engine for legal professionals. Access EU and global case law with AI-powered precision, saving you time and delivering relevant insights instantly.

Contact Us

Tivolska cesta 48, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia