- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case T-603/15: Order of the General Court of 27 March 2017 — Frank v Commission (Action for annulment — Horizon 2020 Framework Programme for Research and Innovation — Calls for proposals and related activities under the ERC Work Programme 2015 — Decision of the ERCEA declaring the proposal submitted by the applicant ineligible — Implied decision of the Commission rejecting the administrative appeal relating to the decision of the ERCEA — Incorrect designation of the defendant — Inadmissibility)
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62015TB0603
62015TB0603
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
Official Journal of the European Union
C 178/19
(Case T-603/15) (<a id="ntc1-C_2017178EN.01001901-E0001" href="#ntr1-C_2017178EN.01001901-E0001"> (<span class="super note-tag">1</span>)</a>)
((Action for annulment - Horizon 2020 Framework Programme for Research and Innovation - Calls for proposals and related activities under the ERC Work Programme 2015 - Decision of the ERCEA declaring the proposal submitted by the applicant ineligible - Implied decision of the Commission rejecting the administrative appeal relating to the decision of the ERCEA - Incorrect designation of the defendant - Inadmissibility))
(2017/C 178/25)
Language of the case: German
Parties
Applicant: Regine Frank (Bonn, Germany) (represented by: initially W. Trautner, subsequently by E. Niitväli and M. Reysen, then by E. Niitväli, M. Reysen and S. Wachs, and finally S. Conrad, lawyers)
Defendant: European Commission (represented by: R. Lyal and B. Conte, acting as agents)
Re:
Application based on Article 263 TFEU seeking the annulment of the decision of the European Research Council Executive Agency (ERCEA) of 5 June 2015 relating, in the context of the ‘ERC starting grant’ programme, to proposal No 680151 of the applicant — which was not given a positive evaluation during step 1 and was not admitted to step 2 of the evaluation — and the Commission’s implied decision rejecting the applicant’s administrative appeal pursuant to Article 22(1) of Council Regulation (EC) No 58/2003 of 19 December 2002 laying down the statute for executive agencies to be entrusted with certain tasks in the management of Community programmes (OJ 2003 L 11, p. 1).
Operative part of the order
1.The action is dismissed as inadmissible.
2.Ms Regine Frank and the European Commission shall bear their own costs.
(<a id="ntr1-C_2017178EN.01001901-E0001" href="#ntc1-C_2017178EN.01001901-E0001">(<span class="super">1</span>)</a> OJ C 48, 8.2.2016)