- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case T-615/22: Order of the General Court of 16 February 2023 — Cyprus v EUIPO — Cemet (Halime) (EU trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Final dismissal of the application for registration of the trade mark in parallel opposition proceedings — Action which has become devoid of purpose — No need to adjudicate)
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62022TB0615
62022TB0615
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
8.5.2023
Official Journal of the European Union
C 164/42
(Case T-615/22) (*)
(EU trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Final dismissal of the application for registration of the trade mark in parallel opposition proceedings - Action which has become devoid of purpose - No need to adjudicate)
(2023/C 164/58)
Language of the case: English
Parties
Applicant: Republic of Cyprus (represented by: S. Malynicz and C. Milbradt, lawyers)
Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: D. Gája, acting as Agent)
Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO: Cemet Oy (Helsinki, Finland)
Re:
By its action under Article 263 TFEU, the Republic of Cyprus seeks the annulment of the decision of the Fifth Board of Appeal of the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) of 28 June 2022 (Case R 121/2022-5).
Operative part of the order
1.There is no longer any need to adjudicate on the action.
2.The Republic of Cyprus and the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) shall each bear their own costs.
(*) Language of the case: English.
(1) OJ C 432, 14.11.2022.