- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case C-467/22 P: Appeal brought on 12 July 2022 by Airoldi Metalli SpA against the order of the General Court (Fourth Chamber) delivered on 2 May 2022 in Case T-328/21, Airoldi Metalli v Commission
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62022CN0467
62022CN0467
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
29.8.2022
Official Journal of the European Union
C 326/17
—
(Case C-467/22 P)
(2022/C 326/25)
Language of the case: English
Parties
Appellant: Airoldi Metalli SpA (represented by: M. Campa, M. Pirovano, V. Villante, D. Rovetta, avvocati, and P. Gjørtler, advokat)
Other party to the proceedings: European Commission
Form of order sought
The appellant claims that the Court should:
—set aside the order under appeal and declare the action brought by Airoldi Metalli SpA admissible;
—refer the case back to the General Court for examining the substance of Airoldi Metalli SpA’s action;
—order the Commission to bear the costs of the present appeal and of the proceedings before the General Court.
Pleas in law and main arguments
The appellant relies on two main grounds of appeal.
First ground of appeal. Error in law in interpreting the final limb of Article 263 (4) TFEU and the requisite and notion of regulatory act which does not entail implementing measures. Wrong qualification of facts and distortion of evidence.
Second ground of appeal. Error in law in interpreting the Article 263 (4) TFEU and in particular the requisite of ‘direct and individual concern’. Wrong qualification of facts.
—