EUR-Lex & EU Commission AI-Powered Semantic Search Engine
Modern Legal
  • Query in any language with multilingual search
  • Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
  • See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Start free trial

Similar Documents

Explore similar documents to your case.

We Found Similar Cases for You

Sign up for free to view them and see the most relevant paragraphs highlighted.

Unknown Title

ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62008TN0273

62008TN0273

January 1, 2008
With Google you find a lot.
With us you find everything. Try it now!

I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!

Valentina R., lawyer

13.9.2008

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 236/14

Action brought on 14 July 2008 — X Technology Swiss v OHIM — Ipko-Amcor (First-On-Skin)

(Case T-273/08)

(2008/C 236/24)

Language in which the application was lodged: German

Parties

Applicant: X Technology Swiss GmbH (Wollerau, Switzerland) (represented by: A. Herbertz, lawyer)

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM: Ipko-Amcor BV (Zoetermeer, Netherlands)

Form of order sought

Amend the decision delivered on 15 May 2008 by the Fourth Board of Appeal of OHIM in Case R 281/2007-4 in such a way that the opposition is rejected.

Pleas in law and main arguments

Applicant for a Community trade mark: the applicant.

Community trade mark concerned: the word mark ‘First-On-Skin’ for goods in Classes 18, 23 and 25 (Application for Registration No 4 019 981).

Proprietor of the mark or sign cited in the opposition proceedings: Ipko-Amcor BV.

Mark or sign cited in opposition: the word mark ‘FIRST’ for goods in Class 25 (Benelux Registration No 401 666), the objection having been lodged against registration for goods in Class 25.

Decision of the Opposition Division: Rejection of the opposition.

Decision of the Board of Appeal: Annulment of the decision of the Opposition Division.

Pleas in law: There is no likelihood of confusion between the opposing marks.

EurLex Case Law

AI-Powered Case Law Search

Query in any language with multilingual search
Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly

Get Instant Answers to Your Legal Questions

Cancel your subscription anytime, no questions asked.Start 14-Day Free Trial

At Modern Legal, we’re building the world’s best search engine for legal professionals. Access EU and global case law with AI-powered precision, saving you time and delivering relevant insights instantly.

Contact Us

Tivolska cesta 48, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia