I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
(Appeal - Article 181 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court - Action for annulment - Fourth paragraph of Article 263 TFEU Article 263 - Admissibility - Decision which is of neither direct nor individual concern to the appellant - Regulatory act - Absence - Article 130 of the Rules of Procedure of the General Court - Assessment of the pleas on the substance - Article 47 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union - Right to effective judicial protection and to a fair trial - Principle of audi alteram partem - Appeal manifestly inadmissible)
(2020/C 68/15)
Language of the case: Polish
Appellant: Republic of Poland (represented by: B. Majczyna, acting as Agent)
Other parties to the proceedings: PGNiG Supply & Trading GmbH (represented by: M. Jeżewski, adwokat), European Commission (represented by: O. Beynet and K. Herrmann, acting as Agents)
Intervener: Federal Republic of Germany (represented by: initially by T. Henze and R. Kanitz, then by R. Kanitz, acting as Agents)
1.The appeal is dismissed as being manifestly inadmissible;
2.The Republic of Poland is to bear its own costs and those incurred by the European Commission.
(<span class="note">1</span>) OJ C 152, 30.4.2018.