- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case C-762/23, Curtea de Apel București (Abolition of severance payment made to judges upon retirement): Judgment of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 5 June 2025 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Curtea de Apel București – Romania) – RL, QN, MR, JT, VS, AX v Curtea de Apel București (Reference for a preliminary ruling – Payment of severance pay to judges and prosecutors upon retirement – Suspension and cancellation of that payment for reasons connected to the need to eliminate a budget deficit – Article 2 TEU – Second subparagraph of Article 19(1) TEU – Principle of judicial independence – Powers of the legislature and executive of Member States to reduce judges’ remuneration – Conditions)
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62023CA0762
62023CA0762
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
Official Journal of the European Union
C series
—
C/2025/4018
28.7.2025
(Case C-762/23,
Curtea de Apel București (Abolition of severance payment made to judges upon retirement))
(Reference for a preliminary ruling - Payment of severance pay to judges and prosecutors upon retirement - Suspension and cancellation of that payment for reasons connected to the need to eliminate a budget deficit - Article 2 TEU - Second subparagraph of Article 19(1) TEU - Principle of judicial independence - Powers of the legislature and executive of Member States to reduce judges’ remuneration - Conditions)
(C/2025/4018)
Language of the case: Romanian
Referring court
Parties to the main proceedings
Applicants: RL, QN, MR, JT, VS, AX
Defendant: Curtea de Apel București
Intervening party: Consiliul Național pentru Combaterea Discriminării
Operative part of the judgment
The second subparagraph of Article 19(1) TEU, read in conjunction with Article 2 TEU,
must be interpreted as meaning that the principle of judicial independence does not preclude the repeal, after it had been continuously suspended for a long period, for reasons connected principally to the need to eliminate an excessive budget deficit of the Member State concerned, of the legislation of that State under which judges with 20 years’ continuous service in the judiciary received, at the time of their retirement or upon leaving the service for other reasons not attributable to them, a severance payment.
—
(1) OJ C, C/2024/2724.
ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2025/4018/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
—