- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case T-381/17: Action brought on 16 June 2017 — Acsen v Parliament
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62017TN0381
62017TN0381
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
14.8.2017
Official Journal of the European Union
C 269/31
(Case T-381/17)
(2017/C 269/42)
Language of the case: Romanian
Parties
Applicant: Ibram Acsen (Bucharest, Romania) (represented by: C. Gagu, lawyer)
Defendant: European Parliament
Form of order sought
The applicant claims that the Court should:
—partially annul Article 22(1)(c) of Directive 2011/35/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 5 April 2011 concerning mergers of public limited liability companies in so far as that provision applies to the absolute nullity of mergers.
Pleas in law and main arguments
In support of the action, the applicant relies on a single plea in law, alleging infringement of the principle that no limitation period can apply in the case of absolute nullity.
—Since Article 22(1)(c) of Directive 2011/35/EU does not distinguish between relative nullity and absolute nullity, the period of six months for initiating nullification proceedings also applies in the event of absolute nullity, contrary to the principle that no limitation period can apply in the case of nullity of such a kind.