- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case T-291/18: Action brought on 7 May 2018 — Biedermann Technologies v EUIPO (Compliant Constructs)
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62018TN0291
62018TN0291
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
(Case T-291/18)
Language of the case: German
Parties
Applicant: Biedermann Technologies GmbH & Co. KG (Donaueschingen, Germany) (represented by: A. Jacob, lawyer)
Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)
Details of the proceedings before EUIPO
Mark at issue: EU word mark ‘Compliant Constructs’ — Application for registration No 16 125 461
Contested decision: Decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 5 March 2018 in Case R 1626/2017-4
Form of order sought
The applicant claims that the Court should:
—annul the contested decision and order registration;
—order EUIPO to pay the costs.
Pleas in law
—Infringement of Article 7(1)(b) and (c) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council;
—Infringement of Article 7(2) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council.