- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case T-20/18: Judgment of the General Court of 26 April 2023 — CV v Commission (Civil service — Officials — Social security — Article 73 of the Staff Regulations — Common rules on the insurance against the risk of accident and of occupational disease — Occupational disease — Medical Committee — Article 22 — Refusal to recognise the occupational nature of a disease — Proper conduct of the pre-litigation procedure — Obligation to state reasons)
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62018TA0020
62018TA0020
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
19.6.2023
Official Journal of the European Union
C 216/38
(Case T-20/18) (<span class="oj-super oj-note-tag">1</span>)
(Civil service - Officials - Social security - Article 73 of the Staff Regulations - Common rules on the insurance against the risk of accident and of occupational disease - Occupational disease - Medical Committee - Article 22 - Refusal to recognise the occupational nature of a disease - Proper conduct of the pre-litigation procedure - Obligation to state reasons)
(2023/C 216/48)
Language of the case: French
Parties
Applicant: CV (represented by: F. Moyse and L. Heisten, lawyers)
Defendant: European Commission (represented by: T.S. Bohr and L. Vernier, acting as Agents)
Re:
By his action under Article 270 TFEU, the applicant seeks, first, the annulment of the decision of the European Commission of 20 March 2017 rejecting his application for recognition of the occupational origin of his disease and the decision of the Commission of 15 March 2017 imposing on the applicant certain costs and fees of the members of the Medical Committee that ruled on that application and, secondly, compensation for the material and non-material damage which the applicant claims to have suffered as a result of those decisions.
Operative part of the judgment
The Court:
1.Dismisses the action;
2.Orders CV to pay the costs.
(<span class="oj-super">1</span>) OJ C 112, 26.3.2018.