EUR-Lex & EU Commission AI-Powered Semantic Search Engine
Modern Legal
  • Query in any language with multilingual search
  • Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
  • See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Start free trial

Similar Documents

Explore similar documents to your case.

We Found Similar Cases for You

Sign up for free to view them and see the most relevant paragraphs highlighted.

Case C-259/21: Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 24 November 2022 — European Parliament v Council of the European Union (Action for annulment — Common fisheries policy — Regulation (EU) 2021/92 — Fixing for 2021 the fishing opportunities for certain fish stocks and groups of fish stocks, applicable in Union waters and, for Union fishing vessels, in certain non-Union waters — Conservation of fishery resources and protection of marine ecosystems through technical measures — Articles 15 to 17 and 20 and the second paragraph of Article 59 — Article 43(3) TFEU — Misuse of powers — Principle of sincere cooperation)

ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62021CA0259

62021CA0259

November 24, 2022
With Google you find a lot.
With us you find everything. Try it now!

I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!

Valentina R., lawyer

23.1.2023

Official Journal of the European Union

C 24/7

(Case C-259/21) (1)

(Action for annulment - Common fisheries policy - Regulation (EU) 2021/92 - Fixing for 2021 the fishing opportunities for certain fish stocks and groups of fish stocks, applicable in Union waters and, for Union fishing vessels, in certain non-Union waters - Conservation of fishery resources and protection of marine ecosystems through technical measures - Articles 15 to 17 and 20 and the second paragraph of Article 59 - Article 43(3) TFEU - Misuse of powers - Principle of sincere cooperation)

(2023/C 24/09)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicant: European Parliament (represented by: I. Liukkonen and I. Terwinghe, acting as Agents)

Defendant: Council of the European Union (represented by: S. Falek, F. Naert and A. Nowak-Salles, acting as Agents)

Intervener in support of the defendant: European Commission (represented by: A. Dawes, A. Stobiecka-Kuik and K. Walkerová, acting as Agents)

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

1.Dismisses the action;

2.Orders the European Parliament to bear its own costs and to pay the costs incurred by the Council of the European Union;

3.Orders the European Commission to bear its own costs.

(1)

OJ C 217, 7.6.2021.

EurLex Case Law

AI-Powered Case Law Search

Query in any language with multilingual search
Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly

Get Instant Answers to Your Legal Questions

Cancel your subscription anytime, no questions asked.Start 14-Day Free Trial

At Modern Legal, we’re building the world’s best search engine for legal professionals. Access EU and global case law with AI-powered precision, saving you time and delivering relevant insights instantly.

Contact Us

Tivolska cesta 48, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia