- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case C-933/19 P: Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 11 November 2021 — Autostrada Wielkopolska S.A. v European Commission, Republic of Poland (Appeal — State aid — Toll-motorway concession — Law providing for an exemption from tolls for certain vehicles — Compensation granted to the concession holder by the Member State for loss of revenue — Shadow toll — Compensation found by the European Commission to be excessive and to include State aid — Commission decision declaring that aid incompatible with the internal market and ordering its recovery — Procedural rights of the aid beneficiary — Commission’s obligation to exercise particular vigilance — Concept of ‘State aid’ — Advantage — Improvement of the concession holder’s expected financial situation — Criterion of the private operator in a market economy — Distortion of the evidence — Breach of the obligation to state reasons — Misreading of the decision at issue — Substitution of grounds — Reversal of the burden of proof — Breach of the principle of primacy of EU law — Judicial review to be conducted by the General Court — Requirements and limits)
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62019CA0933
62019CA0933
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
10.1.2022
Official Journal of the European Union
C 11/3
(Case C-933/19 P)
(Appeal - State aid - Toll-motorway concession - Law providing for an exemption from tolls for certain vehicles - Compensation granted to the concession holder by the Member State for loss of revenue - Shadow toll - Compensation found by the European Commission to be excessive and to include State aid - Commission decision declaring that aid incompatible with the internal market and ordering its recovery - Procedural rights of the aid beneficiary - Commission’s obligation to exercise particular vigilance - Concept of ‘State aid’ - Advantage - Improvement of the concession holder’s expected financial situation - Criterion of the private operator in a market economy - Distortion of the evidence - Breach of the obligation to state reasons - Misreading of the decision at issue - Substitution of grounds - Reversal of the burden of proof - Breach of the principle of primacy of EU law - Judicial review to be conducted by the General Court - Requirements and limits)
(2022/C 11/04)
Language of the case: English
Parties
Appellant: Autostrada Wielkopolska S.A. (represented by: O. Geiss, Rechtsanwalt, and T. Siakka, dikigoros)
Other parties to the proceedings: European Commission (represented by: L. Armati, K. Herrmann and S. Noë, acting as Agents), Republic of Poland (represented by: B. Majczyna and M. Rzotkiewicz, acting as Agents)
Operative part of the judgment
The Court:
1.Dismisses the appeal;
2.Orders Autostrada Wielkopolska S.A. to bear its own costs and to pay those incurred by the European Commission;
3.Orders the Republic of Poland to bear its own costs.
(1)
OJ C 87, 16.3.2020.