- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case T-40/17: Action brought on 19 January 2017 — Habermaaß v EUIPO — Here Global (h)
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62017TN0040
62017TN0040
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
EN
Official Journal of the European Union
C 86/30
(Case T-40/17)
(2017/C 086/40)
Language in which the application was lodged: English
Parties
Applicant: Habermaaß GmbH AG (Bad Rodach, Germany) (represented by: U. Blumenröder, H. Gauß and E. Bertram, lawyers)
Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)
Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Here Global BV (Eindhoven, The Netherlands)
Details of the proceedings before EUIPO
Applicant of the trade mark at issue: Applicant
Trade mark at issue: EU figurative mark containing the word element ‘h’ — Application for registration No 12 833 141
Procedure before EUIPO: Opposition proceedings
Contested decision: Decision of the Second Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 24 October 2016 in Case R 53/2016-2
Form of order sought
The applicant claims that the Court should:
—annul the contested decision;
—order EUIPO to pay the costs.
Pleas in law
—Infringement of Articles 8(1)(b) and 41 of Regulation No 207/2009;
—Infringement of the legal principles to be considered when applying and interpreting the Regulation No 207/2009;
—Infringement of Article 135(4) of the Rules of procedure.