- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case T-120/25: Action brought on 19 February 2025 – Corning v EUIPO – BCH Brühl (Pyrex)
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62025TN0120
62025TN0120
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
Official Journal of the European Union
EN
C series
—
C/2025/1902
7.4.2025
(Case T-120/25)
(C/2025/1902)
Language in which the application was lodged: English
Parties
Applicant: Corning Inc. (Corning, New York, United States) (represented by: R. de Beer, lawyer)
Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office
Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: BCH Brühl – Chemikalien Handel GmbH (Brühl, Germany)
Details of the proceedings before EUIPO
Applicant of the trade mark at issue: Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal
Trade mark at issue: Application for European Union trade mark Pyrex – Application for registration No 18 224 729
Procedure before EUIPO: Opposition proceedings
Contested decision: Decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 18 December 2024 in Case R 193/2024-4
Form of order sought
The applicant claims that the Court should:
—annul the contested decision;
—remit the case to EUIPO so that it can alter the decision on the substance of the case;
—order EUIPO to pay the costs incurred in the proceedings before the Opposition Division, the Board of Appeal, and the General Court.
Plea in law
—Infringement of Article 8(5) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council.
—
ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2025/1902/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
—