EUR-Lex & EU Commission AI-Powered Semantic Search Engine
Modern Legal
  • Query in any language with multilingual search
  • Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
  • See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Start free trial

Similar Documents

Explore similar documents to your case.

We Found Similar Cases for You

Sign up for free to view them and see the most relevant paragraphs highlighted.

Case T-712/16: Action brought on 5 October 2016 — Deutsche Lufthansa v Commission

ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62016TN0712

62016TN0712

October 5, 2016
With Google you find a lot.
With us you find everything. Try it now!

I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!

Valentina R., lawyer

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 462/28

(Case T-712/16)

(2016/C 462/36)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: Deutsche Lufthansa AG (Cologne, Germany) (represented by: S. Völcker, lawyer)

Defendant: European Commission

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

annul, in whole or in part, Commission Decision C(2016) 4964 final of 25 July 2016 in Case No M.3770 — Lufthansa/Swiss — Commission decision on Lufthansa’s request for a partial waiver of the commitments concerning the Zurich-Stockholm and Zurich-Warsaw routes;

order the Commission to pay the costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments

In support of the action, the applicant relies on three pleas in law.

1.First plea in law, alleging that the decision must be annulled because it is vitiated by a manifest error of assessment and as a result breaches the principles of proportionality and protection of legitimate expectations by refusing to review and/or waive certain commitments imposed by Commission Decision of 4 July 2005 in Case No COMP/M.3770 — Lufthansa/Swiss.

2.Second plea in law, alleging that the decision must be annulled because the Commission has breached the principle of good administration in failing to assess carefully and impartially all the elements of the case.

3.Third plea in law, alleging that the decision must be annulled because the Commission has misused its powers in circumventing the administrative procedure under Regulation 1/2003.

EurLex Case Law

AI-Powered Case Law Search

Query in any language with multilingual search
Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly

Get Instant Answers to Your Legal Questions

Cancel your subscription anytime, no questions asked.Start 14-Day Free Trial

At Modern Legal, we’re building the world’s best search engine for legal professionals. Access EU and global case law with AI-powered precision, saving you time and delivering relevant insights instantly.

Contact Us

Tivolska cesta 48, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia