- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case C-134/08: Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Bundesfinanzhof lodged on 2 April 2008 — J.E. Tyson Parketthandel GmbH hanse j. v Hauptzollamt Bremen
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62008CN0134
62008CN0134
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
5.7.2008
Official Journal of the European Union
C 171/12
(Case C-134/08)
(2008/C 171/21)
Language of the case: German
Referring court
Bundesfinanzhof (Germany)
Parties to the main proceedings
Applicant: J.E. Tyson Parketthandel GmbH hanse j.
Defendant: Hauptzollamt Bremen
Question referred
Is Article 4(2) of Council Regulation (EC) No 2193/2003 of 8 December 2003 establishing additional customs duties on imports of certain products originating in the United States of America (1) to be interpreted, contrary to its wording, as meaning that products for which it can be demonstrated that they are on their way to the Community on the date of first application of the additional duties and whose destination cannot be changed are not affected by the additional duty?
(1) OJ 2003 L 328, p. 3.