I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
(Case C-194/17 P) (1)
((Appeal - EU trade mark - Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 - Article 51(1)(a) and (2) and Article 75 - EU trade mark Cystus - Food supplements not for medical purposes - Partial revocation - Lack of genuine use of the trade mark - Perception of the word ‘cystus’ as a descriptive indication of the main ingredient of the goods concerned - Obligation to state reasons))
(2019/C 112/03)
Language of the case: German
Appellant: Georgios Pandalis (represented by: A. Franke, Rechtsanwältin)
Other parties to the proceedings: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) (represented by: S. Hanne and D. Walicka, acting as Agents), LR Health & Beauty Systems GmbH (represented by: N. Weber and L. Thiel, Rechtsanwälte)
The Court:
1.Dismisses the appeal;
2.Orders Mr Georgios Pandalis to pay the costs.
(1) Language of the case: German.
OJ C 300, 11.9.2017.