- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case T-136/17: Action brought on 2 March 2017 — Cotecnica v EUIPO — Mignini & Petrini (cotecnica MAXIMA)
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62017TN0136
62017TN0136
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
24.4.2017
EN
Official Journal of the European Union
C 129/29
(Case T-136/17)
(2017/C 129/43)
Language in which the application was lodged: English
Parties
Applicant: Cotecnica, SCCL (Bellpuig, Spain) (represented by: J. Erdozain López, J. Galán López and J. Devaureix, lawyers)
Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)
Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Mignini & Petrini SpA (Petrignano di Assisi, Italy)
Details of the proceedings before EUIPO
Applicant: Applicant
Trade mark at issue: EU figurative mark containing the word elements ‘cotecnica MAXIMA’ — Application for registration No 13 292 495
Procedure before EUIPO: Opposition proceedings
Contested decision: Decision of the Second Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 17 November 2016 in Case R 853/2016-2
Form of order sought
The applicant claims that the Court should:
—annul the contested decision;
—order EUIPO to pay the costs.
Plea in law
—Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation No 207/2009.