I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
(Case T-657/17)
(2017/C 437/40)
Language in which the application was lodged: English
Applicant: Gidon Anabi Blanga (Mexico, Mexico) (represented by: M. Sanmartín Sanmartín, lawyer)
Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)
Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: The Polo/Lauren Company LP (New York, New York, United States)
Applicant of the trade mark at issue: Applicant
Trade mark at issue: EU word mark ‘HPC POLO’ — Application for registration No 13 531 462
Procedure before EUIPO: Opposition proceedings
Contested decision: Decision of the First Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 14 June 2017 in Case R 2368/2016-1
The applicant claims that the Court should:
—annul the contested decision;
—order EUIPO to bear its own costs and pay the costs of the applicant.
—Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) Regulation No 207/2009.