- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case C-200/21: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunalul București (Romania) lodged on 31 March 2021 — TU and SU v BRD Groupe Société Générale S.A. and Next Capital Solutions Limited
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62021CN0200
62021CN0200
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
9.8.2021
EN
Official Journal of the European Union
C 320/12
(Case C-200/21)
(2021/C 320/15)
Language of the case: Romanian
Referring court
Parties to the main proceedings
Appellants: TU and SU
Respondents: BRD Groupe Société Générale S.A. and Next Capital Solutions Limited
Question referred
Does Directive 93/13/EEC (1) preclude a rule of national law, such as that resulting from Article 712 et seq. of Chapter VI of the Code of Civil Procedure, which lays down a period of 15 days within which a debtor may, by way of an objection to enforcement, rely on the unfairness of a contractual term of the enforceable instrument, given that an action seeking to establish the existence of unfair terms in an enforceable instrument is not subject to any time limit and, in this connection, a debtor may seek suspension of enforcement of the instrument under Article 638(2) of the Code of Civil Procedure?
Council Directive 93/13/EEC of 5 April 1993 on unfair terms in consumer contracts (OJ 1993 L 95, p. 29).
* * *