I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
EN
C series
—
(C/2025/92)
Language in which the application was lodged: English
Applicant: Capella EOOD (Sofia, Bulgaria) (represented by: A. Auer-Reinsdorff, lawyer)
Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office
Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Cartier International AG (Steinhausen, Switzerland)
Applicant of the trade mark at issue: Applicant before the General Court
Trade mark at issue: Application for European Union word mark COLORATURA – Application for registration No 17881418
Procedure before EUIPO: Opposition proceedings
Contested decision: Decision of the Second Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 29 August 2024 in Case R 1358/2022-2
The applicant claims that the Court should:
—annul the contested decision;
—declare priority for the trade mark at issue as of 28th September 2017;
—order EUIPO to pay the costs.
—Violation of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union;
—Infringement of Article 34 of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council, as well as of the priority provision of the Paris Convention;
—Violation of essential formal requirements, i.e. failure to state reasons;
—Violation of the principle of good faith in EU law;
—Violation of the right to a fair trial, inter alia under Article 6 of the European Convention on Human Rights.
—
ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2025/92/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
—