EUR-Lex & EU Commission AI-Powered Semantic Search Engine
Modern Legal
  • Query in any language with multilingual search
  • Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
  • See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Start free trial

Similar Documents

Explore similar documents to your case.

We Found Similar Cases for You

Sign up for free to view them and see the most relevant paragraphs highlighted.

Case T-562/24: Action brought on 30 October 2024 – Capella v EUIPO – Cartier International (COLORATURA)

ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62024TN0562

62024TN0562

October 30, 2024
With Google you find a lot.
With us you find everything. Try it now!

I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!

Valentina R., lawyer

Official Journal of the European Union

EN

C series

C/2025/92

(Case T-562/24)

(C/2025/92)

Language in which the application was lodged: English

Parties

Applicant: Capella EOOD (Sofia, Bulgaria) (represented by: A. Auer-Reinsdorff, lawyer)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Cartier International AG (Steinhausen, Switzerland)

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO

Applicant of the trade mark at issue: Applicant before the General Court

Trade mark at issue: Application for European Union word mark COLORATURA – Application for registration No 17881418

Procedure before EUIPO: Opposition proceedings

Contested decision: Decision of the Second Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 29 August 2024 in Case R 1358/2022-2

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

annul the contested decision;

declare priority for the trade mark at issue as of 28th September 2017;

order EUIPO to pay the costs.

Pleas in law

Violation of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union;

Infringement of Article 34 of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council, as well as of the priority provision of the Paris Convention;

Violation of essential formal requirements, i.e. failure to state reasons;

Violation of the principle of good faith in EU law;

Violation of the right to a fair trial, inter alia under Article 6 of the European Convention on Human Rights.

ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2025/92/oj

ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)

EurLex Case Law

AI-Powered Case Law Search

Query in any language with multilingual search
Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly

Get Instant Answers to Your Legal Questions

Cancel your subscription anytime, no questions asked.Start 14-Day Free Trial

At Modern Legal, we’re building the world’s best search engine for legal professionals. Access EU and global case law with AI-powered precision, saving you time and delivering relevant insights instantly.

Contact Us

Tivolska cesta 48, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia