- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case T-134/19: Judgment of the General Court of 10 March 2021 — AM v EIB (Civil service — EIB staff — Remuneration — Admissibility — Time limit for submitting a request to initiate the conciliation procedure — Act adversely affecting an official — Geographical mobility allowance — Transfer to an external office — Refusal to grant the allowance — Action for annulment and for damages)
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62019TA0134
62019TA0134
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
17.5.2021
Official Journal of the European Union
C 189/16
(Case T-134/19) (*)
(Civil service - EIB staff - Remuneration - Admissibility - Time limit for submitting a request to initiate the conciliation procedure - Act adversely affecting an official - Geographical mobility allowance - Transfer to an external office - Refusal to grant the allowance - Action for annulment and for damages)
(2021/C 189/18)
Language of the case: French
Parties
Applicant: AM (represented by: L. Levi and A. Champetier, lawyers)
Defendant: European Investment Bank (EIB) (represented by: G. Faedo and M. Loizou, acting as Agents, and A. Dal Ferro, lawyer)
Re:
Application based on Article 270 TFEU and on Article 50a of the Statute of the Court of Justice of the European Union seeking, first, the annulment of the decisions of the EIB of 30 June and 11 December 2017 and, in so far as necessary, of the decision of the President of the EIB of 20 November 2018 confirming those decisions, by which it refused to grant the applicant the geographical mobility allowance and, second, compensation for the material and non-material damage allegedly suffered by the applicant further to those decisions.
Operative part of the judgment
The Court:
1.Annuls the decisions of the European Investment Bank (EIB) of 30 June and 11 December 2017 in so far as they refuse AM the geographical mobility allowance;
2.Dismisses the action as to the remainder;
3.Orders the EIB to bear its own costs and to pay those incurred by AM.
(*) Language of the case: French.
ECLI:EU:C:2021:140
* * *
(1) OJ C 155, 6.5.2019.