I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
(Case C-759/21 P) (<span class="oj-super oj-note-tag">1</span>)
(Appeal - Authentication of a judgment by the General Court - Article 118 of the Rules of Procedure of the General Court - Copy of the judgment to be served - Signature of the judges - Agreements, decisions and concerted practices - Article 101 TFEU - Market for tantalum and aluminium electrolytic capacitors - Agreements and concerted practices in respect of several elements of the pricing - Concept of infringement ‘by object’ - European Commission’s burden of proof - Geographic scope of anticompetitive conduct - Single and continuous infringement - Fine - Calculation of the basic amount - Sales to be taken into account - Mitigating circumstances - Unlimited jurisdiction)
(2023/C 321/07)
Language of the case: English
Appellant: Nippon Chemi-Con Corporation (represented by: P. Neideck, H.-J. Niemeyer, M. Röhrig, Rechtsanwälte, and by I.-L. Stoicescu, avocate)
Other party: European Commission (represented by: B. Ernst, T. Franchoo, C. Sjödin and L. Wildpanner, acting as Agents)
The Court:
1.Dismisses the appeal;
2.Orders Nippon Chemi-Con Corporation to bear its own costs and to pay those incurred by the European Commission.
(<span class="oj-super">1</span>) OJ C 64, 7.2.2022.
Language of the case: English