- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case T-368/20: Judgment of the General Court of 16 June 2021 — Smiley Miley v EUIPO — Cyrus Trademarks (MILEY CYRUS) (EU trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for EU word mark MILEY CYRUS — Earlier EU figurative mark CYRUS — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001))
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62020TA0368
62020TA0368
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
Official Journal of the European Union
C 310/25
(Case T-368/20) (*)
(EU trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Application for EU word mark MILEY CYRUS - Earlier EU figurative mark CYRUS - Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001))
(2021/C 310/31)
Language of the case: English
Parties
Applicant: Smiley Miley, Inc. (Nashville, Tennessee, United States) (represented by: J.B. Devaureix, lawyer)
Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: V. Ruzek, acting as Agent)
Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO: Cyrus Trademarks Ltd (Road Town, British Virgin Islands)
Re:
Action brought against the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 2 April 2020 (Case R 2520/2018-4), relating to opposition proceedings between Cyrus Trademarks and Smiley Miley.
Operative part of the judgment
The Court:
1.Annuls the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) of 2 April 2020 (Case R 2520/2018-4);
2.Orders EUIPO to pay the costs.
(*)
Language of the case: English
OJ C 255, 3.8.2020.