I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
(Case T-323/13) (<span class="super note-tag">1</span>)
((EU trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Application for the EU word mark NANOFIL - Invalidity of the earlier EU figurative mark NANO - No need to adjudicate))
(2017/C 144/57)
Language of the case: English
Applicant: Pure Fishing (Spirit Lake, Iowa, United States) (represented by: J. Dickerson, solicitor)
Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: L. Rampini, Agent)
Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO intervening before the General Court: Edward Łabowicz (Kłodzko, Poland) (represented by: M. Żygadło, lawyer)
Action brought against the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 15 April 2013 (Case R 1241/2012-2) relating to opposition proceedings between Mr Łabowicz and Pure Fishing.
1.There is no longer any need to adjudicate on the action.
2.The parties shall bear their own costs.
(<span class="super">1</span>) OJ C 252, 31.8.2013.