EUR-Lex & EU Commission AI-Powered Semantic Search Engine
Modern Legal
  • Query in any language with multilingual search
  • Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
  • See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Start free trial

Similar Documents

Explore similar documents to your case.

We Found Similar Cases for You

Sign up for free to view them and see the most relevant paragraphs highlighted.

Case T-40/21: Action brought on 25 January 2021 — Slovakia v Commission

ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62021TN0040

62021TN0040

January 25, 2021
With Google you find a lot.
With us you find everything. Try it now!

I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!

Valentina R., lawyer

22.3.2021

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 98/30

(Case T-40/21)

(2021/C 98/34)

Language of the case: Slovak

Parties

Applicant: Slovak Republic (represented by: B. Ricziová, Agent)

Defendant: European Commission

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

annul Commission Implementing Decision (EU) 2020/1734 of 18 November 2020 excluding from European Union financing certain expenditure incurred by the Member States under the European Agricultural Guarantee Fund (EAGF) and under the European Agricultural Fund for Rural Development (EAFRD) (1) in so far as it applies a financial correction to the Slovak Republic with regard to the measure ‘Decoupled direct aids’ in respect of the 2016 financial year (and concerning claim years 2013 and 2014) in a total amount of EUR 19 656 905,11;

order the European Commission to pay the costs of the proceedings.

Pleas in law and main arguments

In support of the action, the applicant relies on a single pleas in law, which is based on the infringement of Article 52(4)(a) of Regulation (EU) No 1306/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council (2) in conjunction with Article 34(2) of Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 908/2014 (3) inasmuch as the procedural guarantees under those provisions were not observed in relation to the Slovak Republic.

In its plea in law, the applicant claims that by Implementing Decision 2020/1734, the Commission excludes from European Union financing the sum of EUR 19 656 905,11, incurred by the Slovak Republic under the EAGF and which is part of the financial correction with regard to the measure ‘Decoupled Direct Aids’ in respect of financial year 2016 (Single Area Payment Scheme — weaknesses in LPIS update-quality, quality of on-the-spot checks and instigation of recoveries — claim year 2015), whereas according to the applicant that sum includes claim years 2013 and 2014, which were not the subject of an investigation.

(1) OJ 2020 L 390, p. 10.

(2) Regulation (EU) No 1306/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 17 December 2013 on the financing, management and monitoring of the common agricultural policy and repealing Council Regulations (EEC) No 352/78, (EC) No 165/94, (EC) No 2799/98, (EC) No 814/2000, (EC) No 1290/2005 and (EC) No 485/2008 (OJ 2013 L 347, p. 549).

(3) Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 908/2014 of 6 August 2014 laying down rules for the application of Regulation (EU) No 1306/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council with regard to paying agencies and other bodies, financial management, clearance of accounts, rules on checks, securities and transparency (OJ 2014 L 255, p. 59).

EurLex Case Law

AI-Powered Case Law Search

Query in any language with multilingual search
Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly

Get Instant Answers to Your Legal Questions

Cancel your subscription anytime, no questions asked.Start 14-Day Free Trial

At Modern Legal, we’re building the world’s best search engine for legal professionals. Access EU and global case law with AI-powered precision, saving you time and delivering relevant insights instantly.

Contact Us

Tivolska cesta 48, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia