- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case T-434/22: Judgment of the General Court of 26 July 2023 — Topas v EUIPO — Tarczyński (VEGE STORY) (EU trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for the EU word mark VEGE STORY — Earlier EU word mark végé’ — Relative ground for refusal — No likelihood of confusion — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001)
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62022TA0434
62022TA0434
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
25.9.2023
Official Journal of the European Union
C 338/22
(Case T-434/22) (*)
(EU trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Application for the EU word mark VEGE STORY - Earlier EU word mark végé’ - Relative ground for refusal - No likelihood of confusion - Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001)
(2023/C 338/28)
Language of the case: English
Parties
Applicant: Topas GmbH (Mössingen, Germany) (represented by: S. Hofmann and W. Göpfert, lawyers)
Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: T. Frydendahl, acting as Agent)
Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO, intervener before the General Court: Tarczyński S.A. (Trzebnica, Poland) (represented by: E. Gryc-Zerych, lawyer)
Re:
By its action under Article 263 TFEU, the applicant seeks the annulment of the decision of the Fifth Board of Appeal of the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) of 10 May 2022 (Case R 1977/2021-5).
Operative part of the judgment
The Court:
1.Dismisses the action;
2.Orders Topas GmbH to bear its own costs and to pay those incurred by Tarczyński S.A.;
3.Orders the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) to bear its own costs.
(*)
Language of the case: English
OJ C 326, 29.8.2022