- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case T-801/16 RENV: Judgment of the General Court of 29 May 2018 — Fedtke v EESC (Civil service — Officials — Retirement — Retirement age — Request to extend the period of employment — First and second paragraphs of Article 52 of the Staff Regulations — Interest of the service — Purely confirmatory measure — New and substantial facts — Admissibility)
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62016TA0801
62016TA0801
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
(Case T-801/16 RENV) (*1)
Language of the case: French
Parties
Applicant: Ingrid Fedtke (Wezembeek-Oppem, Belgium) (represented by: M.-A. Lucas, lawyer)
Defendant: European Economic and Social Committee (EESC) (represented by: M. Pascua Mateo, K. Gambino, X. Chamodraka, A. Carvajal and L. Camarena Januzec, acting as Agents, and B. Wägenbaur, lawyer)
Re:
Application pursuant to Article 270 TFEU for annulment of the EESC decision rejecting the applicant’s application to have her period of employment extended until the age of 66.
Operative part of the judgment
The Court:
1.Dismisses the action;
2.Orders Ms Ingrid Fedtke to pay the costs incurred in the present proceedings before both the General Court of the European Union and the European Union Civil Service Tribunal.
*
(*1) OJ C 320, 28.9.2015 (case initially brought before the European Union Civil Service Tribunal under case number F-107/15 and transferred to the General Court of the European Union on 1.9.2016).