- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case T-524/24: Action brought on 14 October 2024 – Vassilev & Chisuse v EUIPO – Vayanos Kostopoulos (VC LAW)
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62024TN0524
62024TN0524
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
Official Journal of the European Union
EN
C series
—
C/2025/84
6.1.2025
(Case T-524/24)
(C/2025/84)
Language in which the application was lodged: English
Parties
Applicant: Vassilev & Chisuse Law Firm (Sofia, Bulgaria) (represented by: Y. Blyahova, lawyer)
Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office
Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Vayanos Kostopoulos Law Firm (Athens, Greece)
Details of the proceedings before EUIPO
Applicant of the trade mark at issue: Applicant before the General Court
Trade mark at issue: Application for European Union trade mark VC LAW– Application for registration No 18 460 787
Procedure before EUIPO: Opposition proceedings
Contested decision: Decision of the First Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 12 August 2024 in Case R 0588/2023-1
Form of order sought
The applicant claims that the Court should:
—annul the contested decision;
—order EUIPO and the intervener in the present proceedings to bear their own costs and to pay the Applicant’s costs of these proceedings, as well as the costs of the appeal procedure before the Board of Appeal.
Plea in law
—Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council.
—
ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2025/84/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
—