- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case T-200/21: Judgment of the General Court of 6 September 2023 — JS v EDPS (Law governing the institutions — Protection of personal data — Regulation (EU) 2018/1725 — Rejection of the complaint to the EDPS concerning the storage and processing of personal data by the SRB — Refusal of the request for review — Right to erasure — Right to object — Right to restriction of processing — Article 26 of the Staff Regulations — Principle of sound administration)
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62021TA0200
62021TA0200
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
Official Journal of the European Union
Series C
C/2023/314
30.10.2023
(Case T-200/21) (<span class="oj-super oj-note-tag">1</span>)
(Law governing the institutions - Protection of personal data - Regulation (EU) 2018/1725 - Rejection of the complaint to the EDPS concerning the storage and processing of personal data by the SRB - Refusal of the request for review - Right to erasure - Right to object - Right to restriction of processing - Article 26 of the Staff Regulations - Principle of sound administration)
(C/2023/314)
Language of the case: English
Parties
Applicant: JS (represented by: L. Levi and A. Champetier, lawyers)
Defendant: European Data Protection Supervisor (represented by: U. Kallenberger and A. Pouliou, Agents)
Re:
By his action, the applicant seeks, first, on the basis of Article 263 TFEU, annulment of the decision of the European Data Protection Supervisor (EDPS) of 18 January 2021 rejecting his complaint (‘the first contested decision’) and of the decision of the EDPS of 9 March 2021 refusing his request for review of the first contested decision (‘the second contested decision’) (together, ‘the contested decisions’) and, secondly, on the basis of Article 268 TFEU, compensation for the damage which he claims to have suffered as a result of the contested decisions.
Operative part of the judgment
The Court:
1.Dismisses the action;
2.Orders JS to pay the costs.
Language of the case: English.
ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2023/314/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)