EUR-Lex & EU Commission AI-Powered Semantic Search Engine
Modern Legal
  • Query in any language with multilingual search
  • Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
  • See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Start free trial

Similar Documents

Explore similar documents to your case.

We Found Similar Cases for You

Sign up for free to view them and see the most relevant paragraphs highlighted.

Case T-730/20: Judgment of the General Court of 23 March 2022 — ON v Commission (Civil service — Members of the contract staff — Remuneration — Expatriation allowance — Article 4(1)(a) of Annex VII to the Staff Regulations — Retroactive refusal — Recovery of undue payments — Article 85 of the Staff Regulations — Action for annulment and for damages)

ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62020TA0730

62020TA0730

March 23, 2022
With Google you find a lot.
With us you find everything. Try it now!

I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!

Valentina R., lawyer

16.5.2022

Official Journal of the European Union

C 198/38

(Case T-730/20) (<span class="oj-super oj-note-tag">1</span>)

(Civil service - Members of the contract staff - Remuneration - Expatriation allowance - Article 4(1)(a) of Annex VII to the Staff Regulations - Retroactive refusal - Recovery of undue payments - Article 85 of the Staff Regulations - Action for annulment and for damages)

(2022/C 198/54)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicant: ON (represented by: N. de Montigny, lawyer)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: T. Bohr and A.-C. Simon, acting as Agents)

Re:

By his action under Article 270 TFEU, the applicant seeks, first, annulment of the decision of the European Commission of 12 March 2020 obliging him to repay an amount of EUR 38 897,39 by way of recovery of undue payments on account of the incorrect payment of an expatriation allowance since his recruitment and, second, compensation for the damage which the applicant claims to have suffered because of the late adjustment by the Commission of that incorrect payment.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

1.Dismisses the action;

2.Orders TA to pay the costs.

(<span class="oj-super">1</span>) OJ C 44, 8.2.2021.

EurLex Case Law

AI-Powered Case Law Search

Query in any language with multilingual search
Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly

Get Instant Answers to Your Legal Questions

Cancel your subscription anytime, no questions asked.Start 14-Day Free Trial

At Modern Legal, we’re building the world’s best search engine for legal professionals. Access EU and global case law with AI-powered precision, saving you time and delivering relevant insights instantly.

Contact Us

Tivolska cesta 48, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia