EUR-Lex & EU Commission AI-Powered Semantic Search Engine
Modern Legal
  • Query in any language with multilingual search
  • Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
  • See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Start free trial

Similar Documents

Explore similar documents to your case.

We Found Similar Cases for You

Sign up for free to view them and see the most relevant paragraphs highlighted.

Case F-43/14: Order of the Civil Service Tribunal (Second Chamber) of 20 July 2016 — Gaj v Commission (Civil service — Officials — Pensions — Transfer of national pension rights — Proposal concerning additional pensionable years — Act not having an adverse effect — Application for a decision not going to the substance of the case — Article 83 of the Rules of Procedure — Action in part inadmissible and in part manifestly lacking any foundation in law — Article 81 of the Rules of Procedure)

ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62014FB0043

62014FB0043

July 20, 2016
With Google you find a lot.
With us you find everything. Try it now!

I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!

Valentina R., lawyer

Official Journal of the European Union

C 364/49

(Case F-43/14) (*)

((Civil service - Officials - Pensions - Transfer of national pension rights - Proposal concerning additional pensionable years - Act not having an adverse effect - Application for a decision not going to the substance of the case - Article 83 of the Rules of Procedure - Action in part inadmissible and in part manifestly lacking any foundation in law - Article 81 of the Rules of Procedure))

(2016/C 364/62)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicant: Wanda Gaj (Brussels, Belgium) (represented by: S. Orlandi, lawyer)

Defendant: European Commission (represented initially by: J. Currall and G. Gattinara, acting as Agents, and subsequently by: G. Gattinara and F. Simonetti, acting as Agents)

Subject matter of the case

Application for annulment of the decision to credit the applicant’s pension in the European Union’s pension scheme pursuant to the new GIPs relating to Articles 11 and 12 of Annex VIII to the Staff Regulations and the decision of 19 August 2013 which closes the file concerning the transfer of the applicant’s pension rights acquired under the Caisse Nationale d’Assurance Vieillesse des Travailleurs Salariés (CNAVTS) (National Old-Age Insurance Fund for Employees).

Operative part of the order

1)The action is dismissed as in part inadmissible and in part manifestly unfounded.

2)Wanda Gaj is to bear her own costs and is ordered to pay the costs incurred by the European Commission.

(*) Language of the case: French.

OJ C 292, 1.9.2014, p. 61.

EurLex Case Law

AI-Powered Case Law Search

Query in any language with multilingual search
Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly

Get Instant Answers to Your Legal Questions

Cancel your subscription anytime, no questions asked.Start 14-Day Free Trial

At Modern Legal, we’re building the world’s best search engine for legal professionals. Access EU and global case law with AI-powered precision, saving you time and delivering relevant insights instantly.

Contact Us

Tivolska cesta 48, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia