I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
(Case T-886/16) (<a id="ntc1-C_2018032EN.01003201-E0001" href="#ntr1-C_2018032EN.01003201-E0001"> (<span class="super note-tag">1</span>)</a>)
((EU trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Revocation of the contested decision - Action which has become devoid of purpose - No need to adjudicate))
(2018/C 032/44)
Language of the case: English
Applicant: Nf Nails In Vogue, SL (Arganda del Rey, Spain) (represented by: L. Jáudenes Sánchez, lawyer)
Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: D. Gája and E. Scheffer, acting as Agents)
Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO: Nails & Beauty Factory GmbH, formerly Nails & Beauty Vertriebs GmbH (Kiel, Germany)
Action brought against the decision of the First Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 5 October 2016 (Case R 202/2016-1), relating to opposition proceedings between Nf Nails In Vogue and Nails & Beauty Vertriebs.
1.There is no longer any need to adjudicate on the action.
2.The European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) is ordered to bear its own costs and to pay those incurred by Nf Nails In Vogue, SL.
(<a id="ntr1-C_2018032EN.01003201-E0001" href="#ntc1-C_2018032EN.01003201-E0001">(<span class="super">1</span>)</a> <a href="./../../../../legal-content/EN/AUTO/?uri=OJ:C:2017:063:TOC">OJ C 63, 27.2.2017</a>.)
* * *