I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
(2016/C 287/37)
Language in which the application was lodged: Czech
Applicant: Moravia Consulting spol. s.r.o. (Brno, Czech Republic) (represented by: M. Kyjovský, lawyer)
Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)
Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Citizen Systems Europe GmbH (Stuttgart, Germany)
Applicant: Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal
Trade mark at issue: European Union word mark ‘SDC-888TII RU’– Application for registration No 12 781 225
Procedure before EUIPO: Opposition proceedings
Contested decision: Decision of the Second Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 1 April 2016 in Case R 1566/2015-2
The applicant claims that the Court should:
—annul the contested decision;
—order EUIPO to pay the costs.
—Infringement of Article 8(4) of Regulation No 207/2009;
—Infringement of Article 52(1)(b) of Regulation No 207/2009;
—Infringement of Article 76(1) of Regulation No 207/2009;
—Infringement of Rule 50(1) of Regulation No 2868/95.