- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case C-638/23, Amt der Tiroler Landesregierung: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Verwaltungsgerichtshofs (Austria) lodged on 24 October 2023 — Amt der Tiroler Landesregierung
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62023CN0638
62023CN0638
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
Official Journal of the European Union
EN
Series C
C/2024/712
22.1.2024
(Case C-638/23, Amt der Tiroler Landesregierung)
(C/2024/712)
Language of the case: German
Referring court
Parties to the main proceedings
Appellant on a point of law: Amt der Tiroler Landesregierung
Respondent authority: Datenschutzbehörde
Other party: Bundesministerin für Justiz
Interested party: CW
Question referred
Is Article 4(7) of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 (1) of the European Parliament and of the Council of 27 April 2016 on the protection of natural persons with regard to the processing of personal data and on the free movement of such data, and repealing Directive 95/46/EC (General Data Protection Regulation; GDPR), to be interpreted as precluding application of a provision of national law (such as, in the present case, Paragraph 2(1) of the Tiroler Datenverarbeitungsgesetz (Tyrol Law on data processing)) in which a particular controller is provided for within the meaning of the second part of Article 4(7) of the GDPR but
this is merely a service (such as, in the present case, the Amt der Tiroler Landesregierung (Office of the Provincial Government of Tyrol)) which, although established by law, is not a natural or legal person nor, in the present case, an authority, but functions merely as an auxiliary apparatus for such an authority and has no full or partial legal capacity of its own;
is nominated without reference to specific processing of personal data, with the result that the purposes and means of specific processing of personal data are not determined by Member State law either;
neither alone nor jointly with others determined the purposes and means of the processing of personal data at issue in the present case?
(1) Regulation (EU) 2016/679 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 27 April 2016 on the protection of natural persons with regard to the processing of personal data and on the free movement of such data, and repealing Directive 95/46/EC (General Data Protection Regulation) (OJ 2016 L 119, p. 1).
ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2024/712/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)