EUR-Lex & EU Commission AI-Powered Semantic Search Engine
Modern Legal
  • Query in any language with multilingual search
  • Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
  • See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Start free trial

Similar Documents

Explore similar documents to your case.

We Found Similar Cases for You

Sign up for free to view them and see the most relevant paragraphs highlighted.

Case C-27/23, Hocinx: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Cour de cassation du Grand-Duché de Luxembourg (Luxembourg) lodged on 23 January 2023 — FV v Caisse pour l’avenir des enfants

ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62023CN0027

62023CN0027

January 23, 2023
With Google you find a lot.
With us you find everything. Try it now!

I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!

Valentina R., lawyer

Official Journal of the European Union

C 155/29

(Case C-27/23, Hocinx) (<span class="oj-super oj-note-tag">1</span>)

(2023/C 155/36)

Language of the case: French

Referring court

Parties to the main proceedings

Appellant: FV

Respondent: Caisse pour l’avenir des enfants

Questions referred

Do the principle of equal treatment guaranteed by Article 45 TFEU and by Article 7(2) of Regulation (EU) No 492/2011 (<span class="oj-super oj-note-tag">2</span>) and the provisions of Article 67 of Regulation (EC) No 883/2004 (<span class="oj-super oj-note-tag">3</span>) and Article 60 of Regulation (EC) No 987/2009 (<span class="oj-super oj-note-tag">4</span>) preclude provisions enacted by a Member State under which frontier workers may not receive a family allowance associated with their employment in that Member State for children placed in care with them under a court order, whereas any child placed in care under a court order and living in that Member State is entitled to receive that allowance which is paid to the natural or legal person who has custody of the child and with whom the child is officially resident and actually lives on a continuous basis? Does the answer to that question depend on whether the frontier worker provides for the upkeep of that child?

The name of the present case is a fictitious name. It does not correspond to the real name of any party to the proceedings.

Regulation (EU) No 492/2011 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 5 April 2011 on freedom of movement for workers within the Union (OJ 2011 L 141, p. 1).

Regulation (EC) No 883/2004 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 29 April 2004 on the coordination of social security systems (OJ 2004 L 166, p. 1).

Regulation (EC) No 987/2009 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 16 September 2009 laying down the procedure for implementing Regulation No 883/2004 on the coordination of social security systems (OJ 2009 L 284, p. 1).

EurLex Case Law

AI-Powered Case Law Search

Query in any language with multilingual search
Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly

Get Instant Answers to Your Legal Questions

Cancel your subscription anytime, no questions asked.Start 14-Day Free Trial

At Modern Legal, we’re building the world’s best search engine for legal professionals. Access EU and global case law with AI-powered precision, saving you time and delivering relevant insights instantly.

Contact Us

Tivolska cesta 48, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia