- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case C-92/18: Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 25 June 2020 — French Republic v European Parliament (Action for annulment — Law of the institutions — Protocol on the location of the seats of the institutions and of certain bodies, offices, agencies and departments of the European Union — European Parliament — Concept of ‘budgetary session’ held in Strasbourg (France) — Article 314 TFEU — Exercise of budgetary powers during an additional plenary part-session held in Brussels (Belgium))
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62018CA0092
62018CA0092
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
24.8.2020
Official Journal of the European Union
C 279/2
(Case C-92/18) (<span class="oj-super oj-note-tag">1</span>)
(Action for annulment - Law of the institutions - Protocol on the location of the seats of the institutions and of certain bodies, offices, agencies and departments of the European Union - European Parliament - Concept of ‘budgetary session’ held in Strasbourg (France) - Article 314 TFEU - Exercise of budgetary powers during an additional plenary part-session held in Brussels (Belgium))
(2020/C 279/02)
Language of the case: French
Parties
Applicant: French Republic (represented initially by: E. de Moustier, A.-L. Desjonquères, J.-L. Carré, F. Alabrune, D. Colas and B. Fodda, and subsequently by E. de Moustier, A.-L. Desjonquères, A. Daly and J.-L. Carré, acting as Agents)
Defendant: European Parliament (represented initially by: R. Crowe, U. Rösslein and S. Lucente, acting as Agents)
Intervener in support of the applicant: Grand Duchy of Luxembourg (represented initially by: D. Holderer, C. Schiltz and T. Uri, and subsequently by C. Schiltz and T. Uri, acting as Agents)
Operative part of the judgment
The Court:
1.Dismisses the action;
2.Orders the French Republic to pay, in addition to its own costs, those of the European Parliament;
3.Orders the Grand Duchy of Luxembourg to bear its own costs.
(<span class="oj-super">1</span>) OJ C 44, 4.2.2019.