EUR-Lex & EU Commission AI-Powered Semantic Search Engine
Modern Legal
  • Query in any language with multilingual search
  • Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
  • See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Start free trial

Similar Documents

Explore similar documents to your case.

We Found Similar Cases for You

Sign up for free to view them and see the most relevant paragraphs highlighted.

Case C-761/18 P: Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 21 January 2021 — Päivi Leino-Sandberg v European Parliament (Appeal — Access to documents of the EU institutions — Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001 — Article 10 — Refusal to grant access — Action before the General Court of the European Union against a decision by the European Parliament refusing to grant access to a document — Disclosure of the annotated document by a third party after the action was lodged — Order that there was no need to adjudicate pronounced by the General Court on the ground that was no longer any interest in bringing proceedings — Error of law)

ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62018CA0761

62018CA0761

January 21, 2021
With Google you find a lot.
With us you find everything. Try it now!

I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!

Valentina R., lawyer

Official Journal of the European Union

C 79/3

(Case C-761/18 P) (<span class="oj-super oj-note-tag">1</span>)

(Appeal - Access to documents of the EU institutions - Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001 - Article 10 - Refusal to grant access - Action before the General Court of the European Union against a decision by the European Parliament refusing to grant access to a document - Disclosure of the annotated document by a third party after the action was lodged - Order that there was no need to adjudicate pronounced by the General Court on the ground that was no longer any interest in bringing proceedings - Error of law)

(2021/C 79/03)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Appellant: Päivi Leino-Sandberg (represented by: O.W. Brouwer and B.A. Verheijen, advocaten, and by S. Schubert, Rechtsanwalt)

Other party to the proceedings: European Parliament (represented by: C. Burgos, I. Anagnostopoulou and L. Vétillard, acting as Agents)

Interveners in support of the applicant: Republic of Finland (represented by: M. Pere, acting as Agent), Kingdom of Sweden (represented: initially by A. Falk, C. Meyer-Seitz, H. Shev, J. Lundberg and H. Eklinder, and subsequently by C. Meyer-Seitz, H. Shev and H. Eklinder, acting as Agents)

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

1.Sets aside the order of the General Court of the European Union of 20 September 2018, Leino-Sandberg v Parliament (T-421/17, not published, EU:T:2018:628);

2.Refers the case back to the General Court of the European Union;

3.Reserves the costs.

* Language of the case: English.

(1) OJ C 82, 4.3.2019.

ECLI:EU:C:2021:140

EurLex Case Law

AI-Powered Case Law Search

Query in any language with multilingual search
Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly

Get Instant Answers to Your Legal Questions

Cancel your subscription anytime, no questions asked.Start 14-Day Free Trial

At Modern Legal, we’re building the world’s best search engine for legal professionals. Access EU and global case law with AI-powered precision, saving you time and delivering relevant insights instantly.

Contact Us

Tivolska cesta 48, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia