- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case F-103/06 REV: Judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal (First Chamber) of 20 September 2011 — Saintraint v Commission (Staff case — Procedure — Application for revision — Article 119 of the Rules of Procedure of the Civil Service Tribunal — Decision of the Tribunal — Application for revision of an order removing a case from the register following discontinuance — No binding effect — Inadmissibility raised by the Tribunal of its own motion)
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62006FA0103
62006FA0103
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
Official Journal of the European Union
C 340/35
(Case F-103/06 REV)
(Staff case - Procedure - Application for revision - Article 119 of the Rules of Procedure of the Civil Service Tribunal - Decision of the Tribunal - Application for revision of an order removing a case from the register following discontinuance - No binding effect - Inadmissibility raised by the Tribunal of its own motion)
2011/C 340/69
Language of the case: French
Parties
Applicant: Antoine Saintraint (La Paz, Bolivia) (represented by: S. Rodrigues, C. Bernard-Glanz and A. Blot, lawyers)
Defendant: European Commission (represented by: J. Currall and G. Berscheid, acting as Agents)
Intervener in support of the Defendant: Council of the European Union (represented by: M. Bauer and J. Herrmann, acting as Agents)
Re:
Application for revision by the applicant against the Order of the First Chamber of the Civil Service Tribunal of 16 September 2010, in Case F-103/06.
Operative part of the judgment
1.The application for revision is dimissed as inadmissible.
2.The applicant for revision is ordered to pay the costs of the Commission.
3.The Council of the European Union, which has intervened in the action for revision, is ordered to bear its own costs.