EUR-Lex & EU Commission AI-Powered Semantic Search Engine
Modern Legal
  • Query in any language with multilingual search
  • Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
  • See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Start free trial

Similar Documents

Explore similar documents to your case.

We Found Similar Cases for You

Sign up for free to view them and see the most relevant paragraphs highlighted.

Case T-240/23: Order of the General Court of 4 November 2024 – LichtBlick v Commission (Action for annulment – State aid – Energy crisis – German law on the containment of electricity prices for end consumers – Decision not to raise objections – No interest in bringing proceedings – Inadmissibility)

ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62023TB0240

62023TB0240

November 4, 2024
With Google you find a lot.
With us you find everything. Try it now!

I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!

Valentina R., lawyer

Official Journal of the European Union

C series

C/2025/72

6.1.2025

(Case T-240/23)

(Action for annulment - State aid - Energy crisis - German law on the containment of electricity prices for end consumers - Decision not to raise objections - No interest in bringing proceedings - Inadmissibility)

(C/2025/72)

Language of the case: German

Parties

Applicant: LichtBlick SE (Hamburg, Germany) (represented by: C. von Hammerstein, P. Roegele and H. Schutte, lawyers)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: T. Scharf and L. Wildpanner, acting as Agents)

Intervener in support of the defendant: Federal Republic of Germany (represented by: N. Scheffel and P.-L. Krüger, acting as Agents)

Re:

By its action under Article 263 TFEU, the applicant seeks the partial annulment of Commission Decision C(2022) 9995 final of 21 December 2022 on State Aid SA.104606 (2222/N) – Germany – TCF: Temporary cost containment of natural gas, heat and electricity price increases, in so far as the European Commission declared compatible with the internal market an aid scheme for the benefit of charging point operators in the context of their activities involving the re-sale of electricity to their clients, without those operators being required to pass on the aid in question to those clients.

Operative part of the order

1.The action is dismissed as inadmissible.

2.LichtBlick SE shall bear its own costs and pay those incurred by the European Commission.

3.The Federal Republic of Germany shall bear its own costs.

Language of the case: German.

ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2025/72/oj

ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)

* * *

EurLex Case Law

AI-Powered Case Law Search

Query in any language with multilingual search
Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly

Get Instant Answers to Your Legal Questions

Cancel your subscription anytime, no questions asked.Start 14-Day Free Trial

At Modern Legal, we’re building the world’s best search engine for legal professionals. Access EU and global case law with AI-powered precision, saving you time and delivering relevant insights instantly.

Contact Us

Tivolska cesta 48, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia