EUR-Lex & EU Commission AI-Powered Semantic Search Engine
Modern Legal
  • Query in any language with multilingual search
  • Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
  • See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Start free trial

Similar Documents

Explore similar documents to your case.

We Found Similar Cases for You

Sign up for free to view them and see the most relevant paragraphs highlighted.

Case T-372/06: Order of the Court of First Instance of 19 December 2008 — Bomba Energia Getränkevertriebs v OHIM — Eckes-Granini (Bomba) (Community trade mark — Opposition — Withdrawal of the opposition — No need to adjudicate)

ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62006TB0372

62006TB0372

January 1, 2006
With Google you find a lot.
With us you find everything. Try it now!

I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!

Valentina R., lawyer

Official Journal of the European Union

C 55/25

(Case T-372/06)

(Community trade mark - Opposition - Withdrawal of the opposition - No need to adjudicate)

(2009/C 55/45)

Language of the case: German

Parties

Applicant: Bomba Energia Getränkevertriebs GmbH (Rohrbach, Austria) (represented by: A. Kockläuner, lawyer)

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: M. Kicia, acting as Agent)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM intervening before the Court of First Instance: Eckes-Granini Group GmbH, formerly Eckes-Granini GmbH & Co. KG (Nieder-Olm, Germany) (represented by: W. Berlit, lawyer)

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of OHIM of 3 October 2006 (Case R 184/2005-2) relating to opposition proceedings between Eckes-Granini GmbH & Co. KG and Bomba Energia Getränkevertriebs GmbH

Operative part of the order

1.There is no longer any need to adjudicate on the action.

2.Bomba Energia Getränkevertriebs GmbH and Eckes-Granini Group GmbH are ordered to bear their own costs and are also ordered to pay half of the costs of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) each.

* * *

(<span class="super">1</span> OJ C 42, 24.2.2007).

EurLex Case Law

AI-Powered Case Law Search

Query in any language with multilingual search
Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly

Get Instant Answers to Your Legal Questions

Cancel your subscription anytime, no questions asked.Start 14-Day Free Trial

At Modern Legal, we’re building the world’s best search engine for legal professionals. Access EU and global case law with AI-powered precision, saving you time and delivering relevant insights instantly.

Contact Us

Tivolska cesta 48, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia