I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
EN
(2016/C 402/62)
Language in which the application was lodged: English
Applicant: Shoe Branding Europe BVBA (Oudenaarde, Belgium) (represented by: J. Løje, lawyer)
Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)
Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: adidas (Herzogenaurach, Germany)
Applicant of the trade mark at issue: Applicant
Trade mark at issue: position mark (Device of two parallel stripes on a shoe) — EU trade mark No 8 398 141
Procedure before EUIPO: Opposition proceedings
Contested decision: Decision of the Second Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 8 June 2016 in Case R 597/2016-2
The applicant claims that the Court should:
—annul the contested decision;
—order EUIPO to pay the costs.
—Infringement of Article 8(5) of Regulation No 207/2009;
—Distortion of facts.